Climate Change
Do Aberdeenshire councillors really mean what they say?' In respect of climate change, that question should have been answered at this Thursday's meeting of the full Aberdeenshire Council ...
On the agenda for 21st January was a Notice of Motion from Democratic Independent
councillor and Green Party member Martin Ford. The motion asked the
Council to confirm that it will hold true to the commitments it has
previously made on tackling climate change, and that it will improve
governance arrangements to ensure targets are met or bettered in future.
A few years ago, Aberdeenshire Council made a range of bold
commitments to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, the main gas that is
causing climate change. In particular, in 2007, the Council unanimously
agreed to a report from its Scrutiny & Audit Committee that
recommended a strategy to progressively reduce emissions of greenhouse
gases directly resulting from the Council's own operations.
Said Cllr Ford: "When the Council agreed to make drastic cuts in carbon dioxide emissions it was made very clear to councillors that
this would be difficult and require the Council to operate and behave
differently in future. Yet councillors, rightly, signed up and promised
to deliver.
"In practice, the Council's efforts to reduce its carbon footprint have had mixed results. [Note 1]
"In effect, my motion asks councillors to do better at keeping to the commitments they have already made."
Doubts about the sincerity of councillors' pledges on climate
change increased last week when members of the Policy & Resources
Committee, with one exception, refused to sign up to the 10:10
campaign. [Note 2]
Said Cllr Ford: "After last week's regrettable failure of
councillors to support the 10:10 campaign, how councillors vote on my
motion this week now has an added significance.
"In a world in which more and more organisations and individuals
are increasing their efforts to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, it
would be a total failure of leadership if Aberdeenshire Council decided
to pull back from existing undertakings."
However. Aberdeenshire Provost Bill Howatson ruled the motion not competent and therefore denied the Council to opportunity to make its position clear.
Notes:
(1) http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1529928
(2) http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1562930
However. Aberdeenshire Provost Bill Howatson ruled the motion not competent and therefore denied the Council to opportunity to make its position clear.
Notes:
(1) http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1529928
(2) http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1562930



